• News
  • Game Insights
  • Industry Trends
  • Courts & Clubs
  • Sponsorships
  • About
  • Contact Us
Buy Now
HomeGame Insights Why Masters finals are now more often moving away from Sundays

Why Masters finals are now more often moving away from Sundays

Racket One on 18 August 2025
Game Insights

The Cincinnati Open is set to finish on a Monday for the second year in a row. For fans it may have looked like a scheduling glitch, but in fact the shift is a direct result of the Masters 1000 reform that changed the calendar and the scale of these events.

Back in 2023, ATP decided to extend several key tournaments to 12–14 days and expand the draw to 96 players. The idea was simple: bring the Masters closer to “mini-Grand Slam” status, with longer duration, more tickets, more broadcast hours, and a bigger tourism boost for host cities.

Today, Indian Wells, Miami, Madrid, Rome, Shanghai, and now Cincinnati follow this format. On paper it makes sense: more tennis means more value. Officially, finals are still scheduled for Sundays, but the longer format and the tight calendar before the US Open make a Sunday finish far from guaranteed.

Cincinnati is not the only case. This season the Canadian Masters also ended on an unusual day — with its final played on a Thursday — raising more questions about a congested schedule.

Players have spoken out. Jannik Sinner said the “old one-week format was simpler and more logical,” while Stefanos Tsitsipas called the two-week Masters “a step backward,” pointing to lower match quality and less recovery time.

For organizers, the benefits are obvious: more days mean more tickets sold, higher hotel turnover, stronger sponsorship deals and broadcast contracts. Tournaments get to showcase themselves in a “longer shop window,” keeping fans’ attention for nearly two weeks.


Croatia, Umag. Tennis stadium
Read more: What a modest tournament in Croatia did to keep fans engaged from the stands

For players and audiences, the formula is less convincing. A Monday final leaves only six days to recover before the US Open, while TV partners risk losing part of their audience that expects weekend finals. To be fair, expanded draws give lower-ranked players rare opportunities to reach the main draw and compete on a bigger stage.

For now, Monday finals are more the exception than the rule. But back-to-back cases in Cincinnati, plus scheduling shifts in Canada, show that commercial reforms are changing the traditional rhythm of the tour — and not everyone is happy about it.

Cover photo: Cincinnati Open. Depositphotos

Racket One on 18 August 2025 Game Insights
previous article
Next article
Author
Racket One
Racket One editorial team, reporting on the global tennis industry. About us

About Us

Racket One

Tennis sponsorship insights

We monitor sponsorship announcements, social media activations, and other publicly available signals to understand how commercial partnerships develop in professional tennis.

Our flagship product, the Tennis & Brands Report, compiles these observations into structured insights on sponsorship trends and brand activity across professional tennis.

  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook

FEATURED POSTS

Australian Open and Bupa: a sponsorship bridging healthcare and tennis
Racket One on Oct 30, 2025

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Insights on tennis sponsorship, brand partnerships, and industry developments – delivered to your inbox.

By subscribing you agree to our Privacy Policy .

Racket One tracks sponsorship activity and brand partnerships across professional tennis.

Insights are based on publicly available sponsorship announcements, brand activations and other open sources.

Linkedin Instagram Facebook

categories

  • News
  • Game Insights
  • Industry Trends
  • Courts & Clubs
  • Sponsorships
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

how to find us

16 Aukstaiciu St, Vilnius, 11341, Lithuania

racketone.main@gmail.com

© 2026 — Racket One. All Rights Reserved.

Back to top